The reformist, August 30, 2009 Category
letters
With a worst case of hypocrisy worthy Victor Felts contends that the fact that Director of the Future, Dino Boffo, is to be deemed immoral is the sentence for harassment and not for his homosexual relationships, as if the disclosure of homosexuality by the director of print owned by the Italian Bishops 'Conference was not much more than tasty gossip, and will not fit the fierce battle for the' hegemony over the head of government between the League and the Vatican.
Instead, what is clear is that the Director of Il Giornale, applying the well-known law of retaliation, that gives greater force to his method with his vitriolic journalism mean censor, or delegitimize your opponent using the weapon of moral judgments, in particular the assessment of its sexual morality.
The unbearable ambiguity of the initiative of Victor Felts, who defend the right to privacy of the Prime disgraced that the Director of the future, and why we feel that we should, with force, to defend freedom of Boffo, and anyone else, to have sexual relations with consenting adults without it becoming the subject of moral evaluation by anyone.
And when we talk about defending freedom of privacy of Boffo, we mean the assumption that he may be, at a time, and contrary to the rights of homosexual couples to same-sex. There is no acceptable rationale behind the argument that a homosexual "veiled" can not attack on homosexuality in public policy initiatives. Our own lack of understanding of imbalance between private behavior and public positions can not get to say goodbye to welcome outing as 'forced' and violent as that made by Felt.
But if you stay within the logic that if the double Boffo Berlusconi is, everything is legitimate, including the next not so veiled threats to Felt on other "revelations" of double standards.
Indeed, all the actors of this story know full well that the only way out of this vicious cycle of blackmail cross is simple, and passes through the serene claim Boffo, Berlusconi and company, not only the right to privacy, but the right to have sexual relations and emotional without it becoming the subject of moral evaluation. We do not know if this will ever happen for the time we record only the negation of everything from noisy Berlusconi and embarrassment of Boffo, who is hiding behind the usual conspiracy theory and aggression. We
, patients will continue to defend the privacy rights of their Lordships. We did, however, politeness to look scornful less superficial demands of equality coming from most of the minority of the millions of Italians who are more concerned of their rights that the morality of others. At the end would be good for everyone, even for them.
Enzo Cucco, director of the Foundation Sandro Sergio Penna
Rovasio, secretary Association of Radical Certain Rights
