What additional reflection on the case Boffo. Boffo
The case can be seen as a game of hypocrisy parallel: on one hand Felt that swearing is not anti-homosexual, but while he knows that the weapon he used to delegitimize Catholic publisher in the eyes of the director are not newspaper of the CEI and the process derivatone harassment, but the supposed homosexuality of the director himself. For all we know, in fact, Boffo has resigned in order not to embarrass the CEI, and what if not about his alleged homosexuality, since the process was fully informed? In parallel
Boffo tries his hand at another hypocrisy, equal and opposite to the previous one: In his many public defense is careful not to clarify the point, neither claiming nor his homosexuality, mind you, his heterosexuality. All this by appealing to a right to privacy is now good for every situation, but useful none.
By the play of these two resultant hypocrisies of estrangement for a nice look at those facts without being enchanted by the conspiracy, so this matter rivers flow analysis with powerful assumptions and weird together, but even a line about it, simple and obvious, which will remain in the annals: the twenty-first century in Italy it is possible to lose his job as editor of a newspaper because someone publicly reveal your homosexuality. Point. And the fact that the editor in question is a publishing company controlled by the CEI (mind you the CEI, not the Vatican State, and a legal entity that applies the laws of the Italian state) is an aggravating, not a mitigating factor as they think many.
There are, however, two other elements worthy of attention.
The first is the charm clear that the "bastards" at Felt have on many, even among the so-called leaders of the Italian gay movement. Let's face it: in fact, a thrill of pleasure we all feel it when a person is considered our enemy is so blatantly disgraced. And in this undeniably momentary pleasure drown all our sponsors and defense, purely liberal, individual rights, forgetting that Felt, applying the law of retaliation, he used the same means which advocates against himself and his publisher have written thousands of lines in recent years.
Part of the charm that the story is Boffo has exercised in this announcement of future sfraceli Felt feared that in his earlier articles. Some things, of course, you may not say explicitly, but in a couple of steps and especially in the mass of the unsaid that runs on the waves of mobile phones of journalists in Italy, the central issue was, but how many files will have at its disposal editor of the newspaper? How many will be those that succeed in the rubbish again, or keep blackmail? And how many other prelates to "smell" of homosexuality that Boffo docet are blackmailed?
All this, of course, has much to do with the desire to look through the keyhole many of us, and stories, which are often stories that are told on a powerful secret archives and using them for their business. And so once again we have taken all my breath a bit 'on hold waiting for the "great earthquake", the giant tissue paper with name and surname of the Cardinals and their fans that according to some grand strategist of the homosexual movement would give the final blow to the arrogance Vatican Italy to finally start to the sun of the gay liberation. The issue of homosexual
in the Catholic church, and his co-influence (along with theological and pastoral or assumed) on the construction of Catholic morality in the sense that restrictive against homosexual behavior in general, is much more serious than a story of gossip. And we should deal with topics and media that have nothing to do with what we have seen in action in the case Boffo.
Enzo Cucco
http://gayindependent.blogspot.com/
six weeks in 2009
