Tuesday, August 7, 2007
It It Ok To Claim Parent That Receives Disability
The place of homosexuality in public discourse in Italy
As luck would have it the same day that started Sgarbi the tragicomic story of the Milan exhibition on art and homosexuality, Veltroni dedicated a square in Rome with Paolo Seganti, gay killing by a stranger in a small garden in the capital.
The second news item appeared on the Roman chronicles, and on some sites, while the former has kept us company (so to say ....) For several days and many newspapers and television. The difference in visibility is known: in general "worth" much more negative news than positive, and there is much to be surprised because it is so always and for all. But I think it is worthwhile to dwell a little on the meaning of the two initiatives - indeed describe the "action stage" - and what better than many essays they simplify the difference between left and right approach to homosexuality in Italy today. Of some left and some right, but that's another story ...
The Milan show was the attempt to reconcile the right Sgarbi with the contemporary reality of gay, or what the mainstreaming of communication in which we are immersed believed to be contemporary. In the Western world today the connection between art, homosexuality and fashion is one of the most powerful common places - in the etymological sense of the term - that shines through, unchallenged, from magazines such as the cultural initiatives. How might the Councillor for Culture of the capital of Italian fashion and design does not reflect this reality? For a city that faces all day with London, Paris, Berlin and Madrid the gap between the public presence of gays in those cities and Milan is almost dramatic. It is from this angle that one can understand the attempts by the Milanese to organize the exhibition "Vade Retro" or whatever they finally called. Sure we can argue whether that was the best way to accomplish this effort (I personally doubt proud of ....), As it seems to me that the charge challenging the initiative, although denied, has been widely exhibited since from the preview of the exhibition with all that flickering of drag queens and half-naked young men. But this does not mean that, in its way, Sgarbi took a matter of fact very clear to those involved in culture and communication: the Italian right to homosexuals do not exist, simply, and every time they appear in public debate must be brought back to the three or four well-known stereotypes. Because if they existed, or whether they could observe without the distorting lenses of injury ethics of religious hierarchies (alas, not only of the Catholic Church) would realize that there are normal people, who are denied certain rights in the name of an ethical vision of the state .
Veltroni has made an "action stage" of a different nature: the meaning of the gesture is of great social importance. Choose to call a homosexual person killed by unknown to the square of the park where he was killed means deploying institutions, and themselves, so the net against homophobic violence. Veltroni has not hidden behind the finger of "if asked for it ..." and took place, clearly, against this violence. But, and here is the limit of this initiative in 2007 in Italy can not be more satisfied with compassion. Violence against homosexuals is also fighting on the other land, not just of symbolic gestures, however great may be their communicative value. And above all you must take a stand out clearly against those who believe that homosexuals are second class citizens and against those who think that discussing rights in our country means to win the right: Is not this thinking, in fact, the majority of the ruling class of the left? Is it not on the basis of this fear - then upset the Catholic hierarchy - that the Italian left has failed its two opportunities to bridge the gap between Italy and the rest of Europe on human rights (not just gay people)? There are two legislatures were well, this and XIII (May 9, 1996 - March 9, 2001), but nothing concrete has happened. And 'as if the left did pretend that gay people exist, recognizing their compassion in times of pain and persecution, but nothing positive at the time of the statement rights.
This is the junction point between the 'action stage "Sgarbi and that of Veltroni: both start from the observation that the homosexual question today is central to public discourse in the country, and strive to provide positive responses, growth-enhancing in the country on this issue (the "clearance" of homosexuality to the Italian right and the "active struggle" against homophobia in public institutions), but both actions are likely to be only a celebration of themselves and of those who have conceived and staged unless it is accompanied from the concrete.
In other words: Councilor Sgarbi is still a large metropolis. We must be satisfied of its action on stage or we can and must ask for anything more? Veltroni is still one of the main center-left leaders: just the compassionate gesture, important as it is?
Both attitudes seem to me not up to the Italian reality. What it needs instead of clear decision on the homosexual question as well as on many other issues that cast on our society.
Enzo Cucco
Sunday, June 17, 2007
Little Einstein Cake Pan
Consistent with the subtitle of this blog I must say that I completely wrong about the outlook for Roma Pride . It is not the first time, it also happened with the Turin Pride, which also had a very different perception, but it is suffering from a pernicious form of pessimism superstitious these things happen to me, sometimes.
But let's get to more important things: the Rome police said that 300,000 people participated, for the Family Day said that the participants were 250,000. In any country where the information does his job this would be the main occupation of the newspapers today. The
Family Day was the support, explicit and powerful , the entire Catholic Church, as well as the entire array of center-right, and has enjoyed a ' media attention that still define the total little. Yet the LGBT movement managed to fill the square as the F amily Day or maybe more . Surely now they will say that you should not play with numbers, that the value of the policy initiatives is not (only) in the number of those involved .... tuto true. but I explained why national media reported the figure of 1 million people in the piazza san giovanni without batting an eye and the pride report the data only as a "declaration of the organizers?
And where are all those who said that the Family Day accounted for the majority of Italians?
Mathematics is not an opinion. In this case for us is an extraordinary satisfaction, and also, as always, a great responsibility. After
Family Day will announce sfraceli in the two opposite poles of the birth of the movement of Pezzotta , however, that I think will annoy especially in PD. The same will happen to us? we will rise to the occasion?
short, there is a lot of work, and the possibility of c otruire a strong national movement (perhaps on the basis of federation, with two or three goals common) explicitly dropped by the parties, perhaps now is a real possibility. Maybe ....
Enzo Cucco
Thursday, May 10, 2007
How To Carve Pinewood
E 'midnight 10 May. Between 48 hours and we will all be over images of a Piazza San Giovanni in Rome invaded by a million people to think about. For people like me never had any real hope for change in this term (a majority-hanging on the wire Mastella Rutelli what ever he could produce different? ...) Will not change much. If you do not increase the disgust of the reading of daily newspapers in the days after (how many weeks ....) Insist on the 'epoch-making event. "
course, all of us in that square gioiremmo if there will be only one person in less than one million that they expect (do not believe sly statements by the spokespersons of the Clerical Day 100/200 speaking of thousand people are expected ...) and there solace in front of the incursions of hyenas and various tg3 that never fail to stress unpresentable sides, possibly homophobic, certainly in that square you will find.
But the truth lies somewhere else. He's in an Italian company which will be marked for years by a clerical minority that is experiencing, as in the rest of the world, a powerful revival. It is a pervasive social minority whose effective on the long-term bet not, since the roots of our secular life are deep, more than our leadership wants to admit. But today we face the reality of a clerical minority who chose to use the weapon of doom based on anthropological legitimacy of homosexual behavior. Using the rhetorical theme of the family as a unifying, as you do when you talk about peace, justice, equality, without specifying at what cost and for whom. The new marketing
Vatican chose the time and the right theme, just like an old liquor or an old candy bar that no one more row. Great communication strategy, many advertising investments, extraordinary wisdom in the shoes of the censored and discriminated against minority (just think, 'also have the nerve to use this argument ...). A celebration of Mulino Bianco, well ....
careful, though, because if we make the mistake of interpreting what happens only using that point of observation would understand nothing of what is actually happening. Just like those who believe that the success of a commercial product is "only" in the relentless television advertising. There is more, and if we do not these questions we are doomed to become, truly this time, the country from which the Catholic reconquest in the world.
What can be done, what weapons to use those who insist on believing, like us, the power of reason and dialogue? I do not know, we'll see what happens, what will the consequences of the medium and long term of this showdown in front of a Catholic. What the sound quality (I have no particular expectations about the quantity) of participation in Piazza Navona, and we must thank the hard head of radical if there is someone who will try to nibble away at least a bit 'of media overexposure of Clerical Day
A pause would not hurt the gay movement. Perhaps to reflect on what and how we contributed to the "success" of the event on May 12 in Piazza San Giovanni in Rome.
Enzo Cucco
May 10, 2007
Monday, March 26, 2007
Catholic Church Membership Form Template
yesterday La Stampa Lucia Annunziata says the de Profundis on say the piece is titled "Why go to Family Day" and tells why is right for the Italian left, especially for one that is heir to the tradition of Togliatti, to participate in that event.
In fact even before the De Profundis was not much to be happy, because all the signals going in the opposite direction to find in the Parliament a draft agreement between the political forces on this reform had already understood that the parties the far left would not exercise (and not the exercise) their right of veto on DICO as has been done on foreign policy and the financial and share what we know and libertarian reformist minority in the parliament and is shy. Today Annunziata had the honor to explain why the DS, Most of this majority can not afford to go on a collision course with the Catholic hierarchy.
The journalist draws in the whole tradition, and even the rhetoric, the Communist family, using arguments that, from my perspective, are limited to two really important things: a context and a political perspective. That is in the context of this phrase: "the heat of battle with the Church moved the tone of extremism I say about homosexual" and the outlook is in the last words of the article: "... the law say it has become infinitely more important what is the reality of the country for its symbolic meaning. But for the public good, is it not found the opportunity to build around a principle of a shared identity, perhaps built up over time, but much broader? Recent polls on the declining popularity of the government's claim that I say you play a big role: Is this not a warning? "
Mind you, I think the Annunziata not far wrong in his analysis: basically just says that Italy is not ready for this step, and perhaps it is better to return and" help the companies grow, "[the quotes is mine] on these issues. Too bad that we do not dwell on the causes of this drama, why the Church has no civil unions of the last resort of the battle for the preservation of Christian society on earth.
What bothers is that resurrect the Communist rhetoric about the family, when in reality they just wanted to say that "Paris is worth a mass." This suggest that, after all, they are "homosexual extremists" when we are faced with a request to approve a law that define reform is almost a gamble.
short, the article proclaimed by heading to the belly of a part of the Italian left, which, after all, without having the courage, you're tired of the history of say, are fed up, sees no reason to pull the rope more and prefers to give evidence of his weakness without even having the courage to go through.
Sure, I say, perhaps, they did lose a few tenths of a point to appeal to this government, but I defy anyone to prove that the participation of the DS and the Margherita party in the event of Piazza San Giovanni will be able to recover this gap.
remains the problem of the position of the Italian gay and lesbian movement on this issue. In particular, I believe that it is not easy task of the next Congress Arcigay, as is made between the anvil of a left that the homosexual issue is becoming tiresome, and the hammer of a clerical hierarchy that playing the card of victimhood, managed to impose his point of view the majority of this parliament and, perhaps, if we leave more space, even the majority of the country.
Enzo Cucco
March 27, 2007
http://gayindependent.blogspot.com/
Sunday, March 18, 2007
How To Regulate Fire In Wood Stove
BUT IT 'ITS TRUE THAT THE BEST ITALIAN SON OF THEIR CLASS POLITICS AND THE CATHOLIC HIERARCHY? The survey
Demos Eurisko, La Repubblica reported today and commented on by Ilvo Diamonds, will certainly have done open the champagne at home Ruini since 2003 has grown on average by 10% the percentage of Italians who came close to most locations hierarchy on the primacy of religion Catholic, on the recognition of civil unions, the relationship between religion and state, about the acceptability of homosexual relations and feedback on dizorzio.
who closely observes the Catholic Church and its communication (at least one expressed by IEC) knows that this is not the result of chance, but is part of a strong long-term strategy that has its start in the Third Assembly of the Church of Palermo ( November 1995) and in the realization of "Project-oriented cultural Christian" was launched in 1997 by the Secretariat of the CEI. The "Cultural Project" is the main instrument of intervention in society's mind Ruini gave birth in the wake of extraordinary communication revolution made by Pope John Paul II. The church has understood that to counter their marginal position in mainstream social and cultural development of the West must use the tools of modern communication in large numbers and their full potential. So it was, and here come the first results. We
consulates to date with the claim that the Italians are more progressive in their political class and Catholic on ethically sensitive issues, and that the church has unleashed a merciless battle just because you feel minority in Italy and worldwide, unable to influence elite and the masses on all major social issues. We forget, however, that minorities have a strength and a vitality that majorities have no more, and that in the society of global communication is not the case that can not happen, even in fast times, social changes of some importance, one way or another.
If we compare the efforts of those who seek a campaign, for example, recognition of unions in fact, the strength, determination, the clarity and ruthlessness (think for example the story of the referendum on the law on artificial insemination and the position the CIS) who reaffirms the principles of traditional morality, is almost laughable considering the absolute difference in means in the field. If it is not enough
generalist television (Just think of the influence that television dramas have had to make homosexual behavior acceptable in the eyes of the National People's Italian audience) to forever change the trend of our society there is little to be happy. It is high time therefore to review in depth the way we plan the campaign for reform of family law (this is about whether you are requesting recognition of de facto unions, even if you can not say ... )? You think that the face of those who want to say is up to the challenge that was launched? Both in terms of investment on this theme, the awareness of the reasons for their positions? I say once again, we must learn as much from the church, despite all its contradictions and maybe no hope of victory, is fighting to claim what he believes. Faced with so much commitment and genuine "faith", I see only a growing embarrassment to defend the recognition of de facto unions and legitimacy, the naturalness of homosexual behavior. I hope I'm wrong.
Enzo Cucco
March 18, 2007
Friday, March 16, 2007
How To Pump Thr Boobs
I hope that the demonstration of 10 March in Rome, and the way in which the print media has portrayed the next day has finally opened the eyes of all who believe in the need for recognize rights to de facto unions. Mind you, I believe that the demonstration was necessary and that it has reached at least three of its goals:
- support those in government and in Parliament, genuinely believe in the necessity of this reform, and this was needed;
- create unity of purpose between the souls of the movement, which has the extraordinary view of the absolute failure of the proposed government and the chronic, lifelong litigation;
- propose to the general public the reasons for the need to ensure equal opportunities for unmarried couples.
But in the square we had the usual suspects, and the press the next day, more or less, gave ample room for a transgression that was not there, making heroes for a day Mastella and the Catholic hierarchy nell'inedita role of victims.
In other words, with the event we have not made any real progress, in fact we measured once more the extent of our actions, for many reasons, failed to go beyond the circle of political forces on which we already know they can count.
This result is not attributable to the will of the organizers of the event was just doing it, and it could only do so, but we must face certifying that a reality, without a shadow of further denial, the very low possibility that the House adopt what little rights that the proposed government plans. Possibility of further decline after the next event clerical-Catholic in favor of the traditional family, where of course there will be tens of thousands of people and politicians from all sides.
What to do? I am among those who think politics is to build as possible, not to dream the impossible, and this is why, despite being among the signers of the manifesto for equal rights ( www.matrimoniodirittogay.it ) turandomi and not just the nose, I think I SAY I'm the best that the Italian company now makes. I am not among those who think that we should reject even this possibility, among them those (and frankly I do not see many) who hope in the next Parliament ...
The paradox that we did not want to face, taken the day of the electoral vote, is that in this term of our key stakeholders should have been the forces of the center-right, or at least those in that group showed more open positions on the recognition day rights of de facto unions. Was not this the only alternative to the enormous veto power that a handful of senators from the center-left loyal to the dictates of the Catholic hierarchy do you have? Was not this the alternative strategy (winning, because winning ...!) Of Margaret, who played like a cat and mouse, reducing month after month value and importance of the proposed government?
The trouble is that the margins to work towards involving parts of the facility right now are slim. The plaintive appeals for freedom of conscience and dialogue with shyness that some members of the center-left to launch the center-right is not likely to be the manifestation of a serious and transparent strategy, but only the first step of an action of unhooking the same parties in the proposed of DICO. Groped for a way to shift the blame for the failure the Parliament and political parties that compose it.
The paradox that we face today, however, is that we do not have other speakers that the same people who have followed us up here: it is to them that we have to ask parliament to work seriously to create the consensus necessary to adopt this reform. Work seriously and believe it means, get involved, go beyond the limits of majority, to make a genuine parliamentary lobbying serious cross, ready to talk, and then to mediation. Retrieve the error that he wanted to force the hand of Parliament (where they already knew that there was no majority) with a government proposal and start over from scratch, with an agreement between the parties sitting in parliament.
I know that this is the most difficult: I do not see any on the horizon "Vicenza" for civil unions, no real forcing in the direction of approving those forces I say that is that until today (RC, PDCI, GREEN ) gained more from this government.
The only thing we need today is the limit, right and left, which also thrive abundant among Italian gay (maybe a little 'less between lesbians and trans). Those who instead of looking for what the Italian reality watching the moon and not the finger, take refuge in the usual controversy hegemonies and ghostly against antidemocraticità Arcigay, or if they laugh because 'the government of the left does not lead to any concrete result on home soil for the rights and secularism.
There is little to laugh, very little.
Enzo Cucco
16/3/2007
http://gayindependent.blogspot.com/
Monday, February 26, 2007
Missouri Dune Buggy Shop
MANIFESTO FOR EQUALITY OF RIGHTS
Appeals
the President of the Republic, the members of the Government, the Italian and European Parliaments, representatives of local institutions, associations for the protection and promotion of civil and human rights, labor, media, citizens and Italian citizens and European
· We the undersigned, being aware of the importance of values \u200b\u200band fundamental principles of equality and equal social dignity enshrined in our Constitution have to free and full development of the person, we believe that the decision of the Government in the field of civil unions does not express a position of secular and European outlook and above is not compatible with our Constitution.
· The question is whose rights are evoked and utilized as a palliative for extreme situations, in other words as mere legal remedies in an emergency or as a pure asset management tools (to support prisoners, the sick and dying, taking over homes for rent, inheritance), however, some remedies existing in our system: on the contrary, the right to carry out a project for living together, marriage or family is fundamental and essential element for the full development of the person and, as such, it is guaranteed by Articles 2 and 3 of the Italian Constitution.
• The government measure provides for the recognition of certain limited rights to persons who have decided to establish a de facto union, but does not exhaust the existing discrimination in our country on grounds of sex and sexual orientation of members of the couple, prejudice in any event no access institution of civil marriage for same-sex couples and thus providing a substantial and unacceptable differences in access to law related to the condition of the person, which is a weak point unacceptable to the fundamental principles of our Constitution.
instead · We are deeply convinced that all citizens and all citizens must be guaranteed equality and equality, and therefore also the right to register in all respects their unions, regardless of their sex and their sexual orientation.
· Need to say that civil marriage is a legal non-replaceable or vicariates by others, and that only with access also to this same-sex couples Institute is fully respected and applied the basic principle of social equality and equal dignity of all citizens enshrined in our Constitution.
• The recognition of de facto couples, the right to civil marriage regardless of gender of the spouses without any compression of parenting and adoption rights, can and must be secured by a law similar to those of Spain, Belgium, the Netherlands and Canada. The legal regulation should refer to family members with the word 'spouse', gives equal treatment to all couples regardless of gender of the spouses and reform the laws where there are explicit forms of discrimination (for example, the Law 40/2004 on assisted reproduction), as required by the Proposed Law 1244 (XV term: first signatory Capezzone).
o have called for an affirmation of freedom to all those who share aspirations inclusive, secular, based on equal rights, their want and that Europe is already there, a Europe in which the right is the horizon culture of individuals, communities and institutions that represent them, against prejudice, exclusion and discrimination, that Article. II 81 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights prohibits any form, including those based on sexual orientation. To join
www.matrimoniodirittogay.it
info@matrimoniodirittogay.it
Thursday, February 8, 2007
Broccoli White Pizza Calorie
Father Raniero Cantalamessa is a Capuchin famosid'Italia more. Comment on the Gospel every Saturday afternoon alle17 RAI 1, 30, and Saturday, December 30 last (theme: the family) has its transmission ospitatonella a former homosexual and his new famigliaeterosessuale.Nessun truly significant impact in truth: just confrontarel'audience of shows such as this with that of popular programs are much better where homosexuality has been treated recently (Banfiin early evening on RAI 1, for example). The case, however, is worthy of notasoprattutto because I believe it is the first example diomosessuale converted to heterosexuality broadcast on Italian televisionepubblica. And especially because the "cut" comunicativoscelto is a real format (sorry for the technicality) moltodiffuso in that part of the so-called Catholic Church in dialogue, geese at least wants to appear tale.Padre Cantalamessa introduced the theme of the family, and the dangers it faces in the modern world. Focused very brevementesulle unions between same-sex (and I think I remember there was no condemnation sure this is very hard for them), while much longer stigmatized the possibility of adozionida part of gay couples. And on this subject has presentatol'intervista. I do not remember the name of the person interviewed, a uomodi about 30 years, visibly moved, but very clear in suaesposizione, who told of being homosexual, of aversofferto much for this, and have found a real life (if you have used this term nonricordo but the sense was that) allapreghiera and thanks to the help of a group of friends. Then the scene changes edappare his wife and their child. Other words on the beauty and dellaloro report on the gift received. Tears of entrambi.Sia Cantalamessa the interviewee stressed that the case nonera generalizable, it was a single story. Ilfrate But he concluded by saying that it was a testimonianzasignificativa on how to cambiare.Ripeto, the words used may be other (I'll try direcuperarle ...) but the overall tone, the editing of the interview, the attitude of all things cozy cappuccino confrontidelle in gay people, the widespread use of emotions (emotion, hope, victory over pain, future ...) cocktailcomunicativamente build a very effective and certainly igrandi packaged for public television, certainly not for the niche ascoltatoridel program on Saturday afternoon (among whom was yours truly ... checucinava). What can I say? Sure with a few keystrokes we can file the casocontinuando with our stepmother eviolenta insults against the Church, or against the use of instrumental and manipulative individual cases (which no one doubts, mind you, because the thousands and thousands of benconosciamo "conversions" in the sensoche occur every day around the world ...). But the substance is another: the Catholic Geraci "dialoguing" (padreCantalamessa is undoubtedly the most famous voice of questagerarchia) indicating a "way out kind"
homosexuality is a path favored by the "prayer and with the help of a group diamici" continues to believe homosexual behavior einaccettabile unnatural, in line with some of the rearguard scienzacontemporanea . In fact, in the case of homosexuality, but also inaltri, the Church has always had a scientific side, ancorchèminoritaria, to support its argument a moral one: the case delpreservativo in AIDS prevention campaigns is a most striking degliesempi In .. other words, homosexual behavior is a disease in voltecurabile sometimes not, which requires understanding and acceptance, but no recognition nepossano special rights that legitimize the existence and value, both individual chesociale. The same vision is most pernicious, because ognitipo visibility brings with it, in the short or long term, knowledge, and overcoming prejudices and accettazioneautentica diversità.Tutto of this is known, and is common in many Protestant churches diffusenel Western world, there was no the new element, type of communication, the transmission is conducted by Cantalamessa. I do not know SESAR uan winning strategy (the Church is also a teacher in strategiecomunicative, we must not forget it), is certainly a novelty, chebisogna report and follow closely, maybe even to change ilmodo to announce that the Italian movement has had in these ultimianni.Come I told the substance of the message is not unanovità Cantalamessa: April 15, 1971 an article appeared in La Stampa firmatodal Romero neurologist who was the spark that set fire to the Outside! The article quoted the book published by Feltrinelli GiacomoDacquino, "Diary of a homosexual", which tells of his unomosessuale becoming heterosexual. The author of the book, ancoravivo, is a renowned psychiatrist and therapist, who published numersissimitesti also very successful exercise in Turin and insegnatoall'Università of Pavia and at the Pontifical Salesian University: maguarda coincidences!
Enzo Cucco
Bluetooth Hacker With Dongle
Dear Knight, and so it seems that she, too, that policy has proven to mean not bad, has discovered a simple truth simple, namely that by dint of taking kicks and a few million bad words (at least)
oomosessuali of electors, you run the risk of losing the vote then. Was he convinced of the contrary? Hear a Calderoli define homosexuals "culattoni", believed to be a trump card to get the vote for the Freedom House? It's good to worry about, but would better reflect the policy of his Coalition for Civil Rights. I will not teach her anything, for heaven's sake, I ask only to go and read the political program of Giuliani, the beloved mayor of New York during the 'September 11, and the next U.S. presidential candidate for the Republican Party. We find the exact opposite of its policy with regard to civil rights. Homosexuals in America will choose who to vote according to the program of economic policy, foreign policy, since there are no major differences with regard to the private sphere. Bush has sent greetings to his deputy Cheney when he learned that his daughter for many years in tandem with another woman is pregnant, obtained by the insemination artificial. I felt good, my dear Knight, the daughter of the vice president of the United States is a lesbian, not single, not single, not culattona, as perhaps would call Calderoli, but a lesbian, recognized, respected, who lives in a society that understands the values \u200b\u200bof modernity. What you can not in our country, in which, there were radicals to impose abortion and divorce, we'd still be here to feel right, center and left, to discuss hot air, cone exactly is happening today on the failure to recognize the homosexuals of their rights. And she, who has represented many hopes with his arive in politics, is behaving like the typical Democrat ever. Sure, it's in good company. From this fact, the government will come out a bruttissma law, which scontenterà all, gay or not. Win the allegiance to that part of the Church who never misses an opportunity to demonstrate all its cruelty to human beings whose only mistake of wanting to see a recognized union, which not only challenges the traditional family, but that he respects and recognizes it. There is another, valid on a civil, and therefore careful not to enter in any way, in the religious field. You say no to all this, while the left
, deceiving homosexuals, will bring out a pateracchio worse. Bindi wins the hypocrisy of the trio-Binet-Rutelli, while she, dear Knight will hand in hand with those who have not yet realized that we are in the twenty-first century. Of votes they will lose, that's for sure, homosexuals are normal people with a brain like everyone else, and that when it's time to vote, will use it, remembering that living in a country that, unlike other, more free and democratic than ours, has not been able to legislate to protect their interests. There will be those who will not vote more than CDL, as there will be those who, based on other considerations, the vote holding your nose. Quaestio happen but also to the left where it is not enough to elect some culattone (Calderoli would say) to digest indigestible toads as being against the West, America, Israel, and repeat the recipe Communist credible. The smoke and mirrors no longer work. I am convinced it will grow much abstention, in antrambi sides. Think back to when he rejected the radical protests of his family Dc. If that result has not satisfied, prepare to his reply. Remember Mussolini and his followers (!) DC, and continues to get us kicked. Glad you ....
Angelo Pezzana
published on February 7, 2007 Free