This morning on the second page of La Stampa published an article by Giacomo Galeazzi, known Vatican and, apparently, close to Opus Dei, which has at least a starting disturbing: "No early elections and release 'soft' by the President of the Council. The most accepted view is Oltretevere another year of Berlusconi at Palazzo Chigi (with the approval of the anti-euthanasia bill Calabrò and other measures to defend life, family, free education) .... " What
Berlusconi would use the themes so-called "ethically sensitive" to recover the relationship with Casini was known, and that cycles through the same issues come back to center stage instrumental in the public is the same: to remember the violent attack against Berlusconi President of the Republic on Eluana?
Now that the effect of the publication of eavesdropping on holidays Arcore, and the start of the relevant criminal proceedings, crack the fragile balance between the interests and image for some time to play between Berlusconi and the Vatican (which also fits within the Boffo case), the perspective becomes much more real and we could really see approved measures or initiatives that were announced in these years and never defined.
Desperation produces the worst, and certainly Berlusconi is hoped-and recover as soon as a strong bond with the Catholic hierarchy who have sustained and supported with generous (and generously reciprocated) in recent years.
months will be very delicate ones that separate us from the upcoming elections, and we will see some good. Many of the things that interest the Vatican can not even pass through Parliament, for example, funding for private schools. But it is on abortion, end of life and family to play the bulk of the game, both content and image. On the subject of abortion would suffice for a national plan to support anti-abortion groups, on the basis of the number of regions have already established, with the addition of a few million of support. At the end of life are the laws under discussion in Parliament. And the family? The quotient family costs too expensive (we're talking about billions of euro) and of course some other symbolic economic intervention can be invented, such as increasing the deductions for dependent children, a one time contribution for each child born. Maybe some more substantial support for large families. Things like that ... but for some time the Vatican hierarchy have returned with greater insistence on the condemnation of all forms of relativism and against those that are considered products of relativism itself: sex education, unions between same-sex civil unions people of different sexes. E 'in this area are in danger of seeing the next steps. And among these, a law amending the code civil aviation and affirming the impossibility of legalizing same-sex unions can not be excluded.
Too pessimistic? I hope so.
Enzo Cucco
January 22, 2011
0 comments:
Post a Comment